Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making

234Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Each of 72 professional personnel consultants rated the suitability of 1 bogus applicant for selected masculine, feminine, and neuter jobs, and for alternatives to employment. Each resumé was identical with the exception of the systematic variation of the applicant's sex and the omission or inclusion of a photo depicting the applicant as physically attractive or unattractive. As predicted, personnel decisions strongly reflected the operation of sex-role stereotypes. These factors similarly affected consultants' recommendations of alternatives to employment and consultants' causal attributions of applicants' projected occupational successes and failures. (28 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1977 American Psychological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S. (1976). Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.3.301

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free