While there may be a tendency to characterize COVID-19 as exclu-sively a public health issue, engineered structures and services have both mitigated and exacerbated the pandemic’s march around the globe, raising questions about the role of engineering in controlling pandemics. Any attempts to answer these questions implicate not only the tools, techniques and problems which we define as within the province of engineering, but also the means by which we ar¬rive at this definition. As described here—in settings ranging from nursing homes to prisons to Brazilian favelas—the COVID-19 crisis has upended a number of foundational notions associated with the practice of hazard mitigation through the design and operation of engineered structures and services. It has revealed the need to ex¬amine the conditions and assumptions that characterize the models we construct and the data we collect. We do so through a number of case studies collected during the COVID-19 crisis, leading to im¬plications for the conduct of research and education to support not only further advances in our field but to improved prospects for im¬proved mitigation of pandemics and other hazards.
CITATION STYLE
Mendonpa, D., Gomes, J. O., Kijewski-Correa, T., Esnard, A. M., & Ramirez, J. (2020). COVID-19 Implications for Research and Education on Engineered Structures and Services. Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy, 1(2), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.18278/jcip.1.2.6
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.