How public interactions via wechat moments predict the emotional well-being of chinese seniors and emerging seniors: The moderating roles of perceived self-network discrepancy and age

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study examined how engaging in public interactions via WeChat Moments (i.e., interactions all WeChat contacts can access) was related to the emotional well-being of Chinese seniors and emerging seniors (50 years or older). Results of an online survey (N = 506) demonstrated that perceived educational self-network discrepancy of WeChat network moderated the relationship between public interactions and emotional well-being such that only at a high level of perceived educational self-network discrepancy public interactions exhibited a significant negative relationship with emotional well-being. Additionally, the interaction between public interactions and perceived educational/social class self-network discrepancy on emotional well-being was further moderated by the participants' age. Specifically, the relationship between public interactions and emotional well-being was only significant and negative at high levels of perceived educational/social class self-network discrepancy among older Chinese seniors and emerging seniors, whereas this relationship was not significant at any level of perceived educational/social class self-network discrepancy among their younger counterparts. This study develops the scholarship on social networking services and well-being by suggesting that the responses one receives from their online network can have a critical impact on their well-being and provides implications about extending socioemotional selectivity theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rui, J. R., Cui, X., Xu, Q., & Yu, N. (2021). How public interactions via wechat moments predict the emotional well-being of chinese seniors and emerging seniors: The moderating roles of perceived self-network discrepancy and age. Cyberpsychology, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-3-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free