Assessment of serum leptin, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and CRP levels as indicators of plaque vulnerability in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract

Introduction: A multifactorial aetiology of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been established in the recent past. Extensive research is now underway to understand the mechanisms responsible for plaque vulnerability. The identification of a novel biomarker that will help in the assessment of plaque status is urgently needed for the purpose of patient stratification and prognostication. The aim of the present study was to evaluate leptin, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome and to assess their diagnostic efficacy in the identification of vulnerable plaques. Methods: The study group comprised 105 patients who had chest pain along with ECG changes (ST elevation, ST depression, T inversion) and raised cardiac enzyme levels. Sixty-two patients with chest pain and ECG changes but with normal cardiac enzyme profiles were included in the control group. Lipid profiles, and leptin, PAPP-A and CRP levels were assessed in these two groups. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were plotted to determine the utility of the parameters under study as markers of plaque vulnerability. Results: Significantly higher levels of serum lipoprotein (a), leptin, PAPP-A and high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) were observed in the cases than in the controls. A positive correlation was observed between CRP and PAPP-A levels as well as CRP and leptin concentrations. ROC curve analysis revealed similar efficacies of CRP and PAPP-A levels in their ability to detect unstable plaques with areas under the curve of 0.762 and 0.732, respectively. Multivariate analysis established the superiority of hs-CRP as a predictor of plaque instability. Conclusions: Our study highlights the utility of both CRP and PAPP-A levels as determinants of plaque instability. Our findings necessitate population-based follow-up studies to establish the superiority of either of the two biomarkers in the field of preventive cardiology.