Artificial propagation and induction of triploidy in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and policy discrimination using erythrocyte length

10Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We describe an artificial propagation procedure and simple ploidy discrimination techniques using erythrocyte major axis length for largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Hormonal treatments of 5 mg/kg of carp pituitary and 50 μg/kg of leutinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) produced viable gametes in 21-24 h, and triploidy was induced using a pressure treatment of 563 kg/cm2 on embryos for a 1-min duration exactly 5 min following fertilization. We produced about 500 fingerling triploids and about 500 diploid controls, and verified genetic status of a subset of each group using flow cytometry. Erythrocyte length was measured for 10 known diploid and 10 known triploid individuals. Remaining fish were internally microtagged with group-specific tags and mixed to test the model. We developed ploidy discrimination intervals based on the 99% confidence limits of mean erythrocyte length (MEL, N = 25 erythrocytes) for individual fish, which were 14.43-16.66 μm for triploids, and 10.23-13.62 μm for diploids. Logistic regression provided the discrimination model: Ploidy status (±) = -196.16 + 13.97 × MEL, with positive (+) outcomes considered triploid. Both discrimination techniques were 100% effective at differentiating ploidy of the 22 microtagged largemouth bass recollected from the mixed population. We did not observe a significant change in erythrocyte length as fish size increased, indicating that erythrocyte length is an accurate predictor of ploidy for all sizes of largemouth bass. © by the World Aquaculture Society 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neal, J. W., Neal, D. M., Noble, R. L., & McGee, M. V. (2004). Artificial propagation and induction of triploidy in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and policy discrimination using erythrocyte length. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 35(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2004.tb01058.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free