How to evaluate supply chain risks, including sustainable aspects? A case study from the German industry

10Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Outsourcing transactions have been arisen and evolved in the last years and purchase managers want to know if a Failure Mode Effects and Analysis (FMEA) is an effective qualitative technique to analyze supply chain risks (SCR) in a proper way. The aim of this study is to address this question developing a practicable risk management process based on the guidelines of the ISO 31000 for upstream Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) linking risk assessment, risk identification, risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk treatment and validate the process empirically through a case study. Design/methodology/approach: After a review of the literature on Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management (SSCRM), a case study based on a leading manufacturer of electrical products, collects evidences of SSCRM implementation. Findings: Supply chain disruptions are one of the most critical issues which can negatively influence on firm’s performance. Avoiding and mitigating disruptions in the supply chain is one of the main challenges for supply chain managers. Originality/value: This paper identifies the ISO 31000, the ISO 9001 and the use of an FMEA to analyze supply chain risks in a structured manner and to outline future research opportunities in the field of SCRM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Medina-Serrano, R., González-Ramírez, R., Gasco-Gasco, J., & Llopis-Taverner, J. (2021). How to evaluate supply chain risks, including sustainable aspects? A case study from the German industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 14(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3175

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free