Initial experience with transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This retrospective study examined the safety and efficacy of transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy (TUEB) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), based on initial experiences. Methods: In this study, 2 surgeons performed TUEB on 23 patients between January 2014 and April 2017. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, maximum flow rate (Qmax), and postvoid residual urine (PVR) were used as variables. Resected prostate volume (g), resection time, efficiency of resection, change in hemoglobin, and indwelling Foley catheter duration were used to assess the efficacy of TUEB. Foley catheter reinsertion rate, occurrence of urethral or bladder neck stricture, urinary incontinence, and bladder injury were evaluated as complications of TUEB. Results: Mean age was 70.3±8.3 years. Mean prostate volume was 55.1±33.9 g. Preoperative and 1-month postoperative PSA, IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and PVR data were collected and showed significant difference. Resected prostate volume, resection time, resection efficiency, indwelling Foley catheter duration, and change in hemoglobin values were 22.9±14.7 g, 109.6±60.3 minutes, 0.23±0.13 g/min, 4.7±4.7 days, and 0.9±0.7 g/dL, respectively. Following TUEB, incontinence occurred in 2 patients and acute urinary retention in 2 (8.7%). Conclusion: Our initial experience suggests that TUEB is efficient and safe for patients with BPH. However, the study was limited by the small number of subjects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, D. Y., Park, D. H., Hwang, C. H., Lee, J. B., Yoon, J. H., Jeong, T. W., & Na, W. (2017). Initial experience with transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 21(4), 206–209. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.2017.21.4.206

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free