Minimally invasive interventions for lower urinary tract symptoms: What sits between medical therapy and transurethral resection of the prostate

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background There are a variety of medical and surgical treatment options available today for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Objective The aim of this paper is to highlight the various treatment options available for the management of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH and discuss the benefits and potential drawbacks of each. Discussion Lifestyle and dietary modification and medical therapies, such as an alpha-1 blocker as monotherapy, should be considered as first-line when initially counselling a patient for LUTS secondary to bladder outlet obstruction due to BPH. If bothersome LUTS persist despite medical management, or if medical management is not suitable or preferable, then surgical interventions can be considered. The mainstay of surgical intervention has traditionally been transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP); however, the treatment landscape is rapidly evolving with the development of minimally invasive procedures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yanada, B. A., Homewood, D., Reeves, F., & Bolton, D. (2024). Minimally invasive interventions for lower urinary tract symptoms: What sits between medical therapy and transurethral resection of the prostate. Australian Journal of General Practice, 53(5), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-10-23-7007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free