Comparison of epidural and intravenous opioid analgesia after elective caesarean section

11Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Patient acceptance is a particularly relevant method of assessing currently employed epidural and intravenous techniques of opioid analgesia after elective caesarean section. We have prospectively studied 71 such patients, randomised postoperatively to receive epidural morphine, intravenous morphine or intravenous pethidine. When compared with either intravenous opioid, epidural morphine provided twofold better average or excellent analgesia with 30% less drowsiness but with about 50% more pruritus. In spite of this trouble some complication, more patients (83% vs 74%) preferred epidural to intravenous opioid analgesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cade, L., Ashley, J., & Ross, A. W. (1992). Comparison of epidural and intravenous opioid analgesia after elective caesarean section. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 20(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9202000108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free