Lyotard and the ‘figural’ in Performance, Art and Writing

15Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This original study offers a timely reconsideration of the work of French philosopher Jean-François Lyotard in relation to art, performance and writing. How can we write about art, whilst acknowledging the transformation that inevitably accompanies translations of both media and temporality? That is the question that persistently dogs Lyotard’s own writings on art, and to which this book responds through reference to artists from the recently-formed canon of performance art history, including the myths of seminal figures Marina Abramovic and Vito Acconci, and the controlled documentation of Gina Pane’s actions. Through the unstable, untranslatable element that Lyotard calls the figural, his thought is brought to bear on attempts to write a history of performance art and to question the paradoxically prescriptive demand for rules to govern ‘re-performance’. Kiff Bamford contextualises Lyotard’s writings and approach with reference to both his contemporaries, including Deleuze and Kristeva, and the contemporary art about which they wrote, whilst arguing for the pertinence of Lyotard’s provocations today.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bamford, K. (2012). Lyotard and the ‘figural’ in Performance, Art and Writing. Lyotard and the ‘figural’ in Performance, Art and Writing (pp. 1–216). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2015.1031020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free