Coding without sight: accessibility, adaptation, and rigor in content analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Content analysis is a common method in media studies, but its reliance on visual and spatial tools often excludes blind and visually impaired researchers. Drawing from personal experience as a blind media scholar, the author highlights challenges with tools like spreadsheets, coding software, and data visualizations. While assistive technologies such as screen readers and optical character recognition (OCR) have improved access to text, they are insufficient for complex datasets or visual materials. Many emerging content analysis tools, including NVivo, R, and Python libraries, lack accessibility features, hindering independent participation. The absence of institutional support and inclusive training worsens these barriers. This reflects a deeper epistemic injustice, where research tools assume sight as the norm. To promote equity, there is an urgent need for accessible-by-design technologies and structural support through communities and inclusive software development. Coding should be based on critical thinking and categorization, not visual ability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Emara, I. H. (2026). Coding without sight: accessibility, adaptation, and rigor in content analysis. Disability and Society, 41(7), 1966–1970. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2025.2568504

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free