Nitric oxide diffusing capacity versus spirometry in the early diagnosis of emphysema in smokers

23Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The diffusion capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) is independent of pulmonary capillary blood volume and equals the membrane diffusing capacity. Therefore the DLNO could be more sensitive in detecting alveolar destruction than the DLCO. We measured flow-volumes curves, DLNO, DLCO, the transfer coefficients KNO (DLNO/VA) and KCO (DLCO/VA) and performed computed tomography (CT) scans in 263 randomly selected heavy smokers. Subjects with areas ≥1% of the total lung volume showing an attenuation <-950 Hounsfield Units were considered to have emphysema. In 36 subjects emphysema was diagnosed with CT, a low KNO was present in 94 subjects, and in 95 subjects a FEV1/FVC ratio <70% was seen. The area under the ROC curve for detection CT-based emphysema was 0.894 for the KNO, 0.822 for the KCO and 0.795 for FEV1/FVC, meaning that the KNO has a slightly higher sensitivity to detect emphysema than the KCO and FEV1/FVC. The positive predictive value of KNO however was low (34.7%), while the negative predictive value of KNO was very high (98.2%), indicating an emphysema exclusion test. The DLNO/DLCO ratio is significantly higher in the study group compared to normal subjects. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van der Lee, I., Gietema, H. A., Zanen, P., van Klaveren, R. J., Prokop, M., Lammers, J. W. J., & van den Bosch, J. M. M. (2009). Nitric oxide diffusing capacity versus spirometry in the early diagnosis of emphysema in smokers. Respiratory Medicine, 103(12), 1892–1897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2009.06.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free