Comparison of Different Parametric Methods in Handling Critical Multicollinearity: Monte Carlo Simulation Study

  • Maxwell O
  • Chukwudike C
  • Chinedu O
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In regression analysis, it is relatively necessary to have a correlation between the response and explanatory variables, but having correlations amongst explanatory variables is something undesired. This paper focuses on five methodologies for handling critical multicollinearity, they include: Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR), Ridge Regression (RR), Ordinary Least Square Regression (OLS), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operator (LASSO) Regression, and the Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Monte Carlo Simulations comparing the methods was carried out with the sample size greater than or equal to the levels  considered in most cases, the Average Mean Square Error (AMSE) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) values were computed. The result shows that PCR is the most superior and more efficient in handling critical multicollinearity problems, having the lowest AMSE and AIC values for all the sample sizes and different levels considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maxwell, O., Chukwudike, C. N., Chinedu, O. V., Valentine, C. O., & Paul, O. C. (2019). Comparison of Different Parametric Methods in Handling Critical Multicollinearity: Monte Carlo Simulation Study. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2019/v3i230085

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free