Conflicting Strategies for Contested Resources: Pastoralists’ Responses to Uncertainty in Post-socialist Rural Kyrgyzstan

18Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Based on a case study in rural Kyrgyzstan, this chapter explores the multiple constraints which shape agro-pastoral practices today and how local households respond to them. To do so, it distinguishes between different forms of uncertainty, that is, social and political, livelihoods, knowledge and ecological uncertainties. Results show that Kyrgyz agro-pastoralists must respond to much more than ecological uncertainties only, and that the extent of these uncertainties differs a lot between the rich and the poor. Responding to these uncertainties, wealthier households often refer to different sets of norms and practices to justify their claim on pastures and other resources – a practice typically described as ‘forum shopping’. At the same time, rich and poor households alike constantly try to diversify their cash income sources, often beyond agro-pastoral production. The example of herders taking paid employment in a foreign mining company on their communal pastures shows that such diversification can rapidly become precarious in the sense that newly adopted income sources may contradict with pastoral practices and may seriously threaten subsistence production in the long run.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steimann, B. (2012). Conflicting Strategies for Contested Resources: Pastoralists’ Responses to Uncertainty in Post-socialist Rural Kyrgyzstan. In Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research (pp. 145–160). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3846-1_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free