Non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG) and balloon tamponade decrease maternal mortality and morbidity from Obstetrics Haemorrhage: A prospective observational study

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Obstetric haemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted among 132 women admitted, booked/referred, at tertiary care centre with Obstetric Haemorrhage for 2 years period. Of these 71 patients had received Non-pneumatic antishock garment and / or Uterine Balloon Tamponade (Group 1) and 61 didn’t receive any (Group 2). Both groups were observed for its outcome. Results: The socio-demographic parameters and obstetric characteristics among both groups were comparable. However, there were differences in their outcomes and complications. Surgical interventions were more among group 2 as compared to group 1, B-lynch/Modified B-lynch (8.4% vs. 1.6%), Stepwise devascularisation (2.8% vs. 1.6%) and Obstetric hysterectomy (7.0% vs. 3.2%). There was significantly more blood loss in Group 2 than group 1. Duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter (9.8±2.7 days) in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (12.7±3.6). The shock index after intervention was significantly smaller (0.7±0.1) in Group 1 in comparison to Group 2 (0.8±0.1) and Group 1 required significantly less number of blood and blood products as compared to group 2. 19.7% required ICU admission in group 1 and 24.6% in Group 2. There was no mortality in group 1 and 3 patients died in group 2. Conclusion: NASG and UBT is both life-saving and cost effective and can become the first defence against Obstetric Haemorrhage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zarariya, A., Chaubey, A., & Harikanth, D. R. (2023). Non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG) and balloon tamponade decrease maternal mortality and morbidity from Obstetrics Haemorrhage: A prospective observational study. Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, 10(4), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.083

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free