Statistical analysis of the gravitational anomaly in Gaia wide binaries

13Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The exploration of the low acceleration a < a0 regime, where a0 = 1.2 × 10−10 m s−2 is the acceleration scale of MOND around which gravitational anomalies at galactic scale appear, has recently been extended to the much smaller mass and length scales of local wide binaries thanks to the availability of the Gaia catalogue. Statistical methods to test the underlying structure of gravity using large samples of such binary stars and dealing with the necessary presence of kinematic contaminants in such samples have also been presented. However, an alternative approach using binary samples carefully selected to avoid any such contaminants, and consequently much smaller samples, has been lacking a formal statistical development. In the interest of having independent high-quality checks on the results of wide binary gravity tests, we here develop a formal statistical framework for treating small, clean, wide binary samples in the context of testing modifications to gravity of the form G → γ G. The method is validated through extensive tests with synthetic data samples, and applied to recent Gaia DR3 binary star observational samples of relative velocities and internal separations on the plane of the sky, v2D and r2D, respectively. Our final results for a high acceleration r2D < 0.01 pc region are of γ = 1.000 ± 0.096, in full accordance with Newtonian expectations. For a low acceleration r2D > 0.01 pc region, however, we obtain γ = 1.5 ± 0.2, inconsistent with the Newtonian value of γ = 1 at a 2.6σ level, and much more indicative of MOND AQUAL predictions of close to γ = 1.4.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hernandez, X., Verteletskyi, V., Nasser, L., & Aguayo-Ortiz, A. (2024). Statistical analysis of the gravitational anomaly in Gaia wide binaries. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 528(3), 4720–4732. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free