Abstract
Traditionally, all cholecystectomy specimens resected for symptomatic cholelithiasis were sent for histological evaluation. The objectives of such evaluation are to confirm the clinicoradiological diagnosis, identification of unsuspected findings including incidental gallbladder malignancy, audit and research purposes, and quality control issues. Currently, there is a developing trend to consider selective histological evaluation of surgical specimens removed for clinically benign disease. This article discusses the need for routine or selective histopathological evaluation of gallbladder specimens following cholecystectomy. Although several retrospective studies have suggested selective histological evaluation of cholecystectomy specimens performed for symptomatic cholelithiasis, the evidence is not adequate at present to recommend selective histological evaluation globally. However, it may be appropriate to consider selective histological evaluation on a regional basis in areas of extremely low incidence of gallbladder cancer only after unanimous agreement between the governing bodies of surgical and histopathological expertise.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jayasundara, J. A. S. B., & de Silva, W. M. M. (2013). Histological assessment of cholecystectomy specimens performed for symptomatic cholelithiasis: Routine or selective? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13629960046471
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.