Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Characteristics, Treatments, and Outcomes From a Population-Based Study

11Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives We evaluated a population-based cohort of metastatic well-differentiated grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) to describe their characteristics, prognosis, and treatment outcomes. Methods The British Columbia provincial database was queried for G3 NETs diagnosed 2004 to 2021, and charts were reviewed to describe clinical features and outcomes. Results Forty-one patients were identified, most were diagnosed with pancreatic (58.5%) or midgut (26.8%) primary tumor and Ki-67 was less than 55% in 68.3%. The primary was resected in 19 (46.3%) with median disease-free survival of 25.2 months. Once metastatic, patients received a median of one line of systemic therapy. Median overall survival with metastatic disease was 33.8 months. Median progression-free survival was longest in patients treated with capecitabine-temozolomide (20.6 months) or somatostatin analogs (7.9 months), while etoposide-platinum provided little benefit (2.4 months). Limited data of efficacy for targeted therapies and radionuclide therapy was available. Seven patients (17.1%) were also treated with local therapies, which were associated with improved overall survival (median not reached, hazard ratio, 0.23; P = 0.012). Conclusions Capecitabine-temozolomide and somatostatin analogs were associated with clinically meaningful benefit, and use of local therapies provided benefits in selected patients. Multidisciplinary discussion is essential to optimize individual outcomes in this heterogeneous population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boutin, M., Mathews, A., Badesha, J., Paul, A., Safro, M., Gill, S., … Loree, J. M. (2022). Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Characteristics, Treatments, and Outcomes From a Population-Based Study. Pancreas, 51(7), 756–762. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002100

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free