Assessing Postsurgical Outcomes with Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Update

9Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is an alternative to subpectoral/dual-plane reconstruction. Methods: This study examined outcomes of prepectoral reconstruction using a meta-Analysis of data pooled with data from our previous review. Thirty studies were included. Results: Explantation, seroma, and infection were the most common complications with no animation deformity reported. Significantly lower odds of infection were observed with prepectoral compared with dual-plane reconstruction. Conclusions: Current literature suggests that prepectoral reconstruction may be associated with lower rates of postsurgical infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chatterjee, A., Nahabedian, M. Y., Gabriel, A., Sporck, M., Parekh, M., Macarios, D., … Sigalove, S. (2021). Assessing Postsurgical Outcomes with Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Update. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, 9(10), E3825. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003825

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free