Usefulness of silent MR angiography for intracranial aneurysms treated with a flow-diverter device

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDANDPURPOSE: The flow-diverter device has been established as a treatment procedure for large unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to compare the usefulness of Silent MR angiography and time-of-flight MRA to assess the parent artery and the embolization state of the aneurysm after a flow-diverter placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight large, unruptured internal carotid aneurysms in 78 patients were the subjects of this study. After 6 months of treatment, they underwent follow-up digital subtraction angiography, Silent MRA, and TOF-MRA, performed simultaneously. All images were independently reviewed by 2 neurosurgeons and 1 radiologist and rated on a 4-point scale from 1 (not visible) to 4 (excellent) to evaluate the parent artery. The aneurysmal embolization status was assessed with 2 ratings: Complete or incomplete occlusion. RESULTS: The mean scores of SilentMRAand TOF-MRA regarding the parent artery were 3.18±0.72 and 2.31±0.86, respectively, showing a significantly better score with Silent MRA (P < .01). In the assessment of the embolization of aneurysms on Silent MRA and TOF-MRA compared with DSA, the percentages of agreement were 91.0% and 80.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Silent MRA is superior for visualizing blood flow images inside flow-diverter devices compared with TOF-MRA. Furthermore, Silent MRA enables the assessment of aneurysmal embolization status. Silent MRA is useful for assessing the status of large and giant unruptured internal carotid aneurysms after flow-diverter placement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oishi, H., Fujii, T., Suzuki, M., Takano, N., Teranishi, K., Yatomi, K., … Arai, H. (2019). Usefulness of silent MR angiography for intracranial aneurysms treated with a flow-diverter device. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 40(5), 808–814. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free