Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes

111Citations
Citations of this article
164Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Motivation: Despite near-experimental accuracy on single-chain predictions, there is still scope for improvement among multimeric predictions. Methods like AlphaFold-Multimer and FoldDock can accurately model dimers. However, how well these methods fare on larger complexes is still unclear. Further, evaluation methods of the quality of multimeric complexes are not well established. Results: We analysed the performance of AlphaFold-Multimer on a homology-reduced dataset of homo- and heteromeric protein complexes. We highlight the differences between the pairwise and multi-interface evaluation of chains within a multimer. We describe why certain complexes perform well on one metric (e.g. TM-score) but poorly on another (e.g. DockQ). We propose a new score, Predicted DockQ version 2 (pDockQ2), to estimate the quality of each interface in a multimer. Finally, we modelled protein complexes (from CORUM) and identified two highly confident structures that do not have sequence homology to any existing structures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, W., Shenoy, A., Kundrotas, P., & Elofsson, A. (2023). Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes. Bioinformatics, 39(7). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free