Abstract
The goal of the study is to inquire into how longer tenure on the board may undermine directors’ independence and distort the efficiency of executive compensation mechanisms. Our empirical findings based on an international panel database and static panel regression modeling demonstrate that director tenure is positively associated with executive compensation with the effect being amplified by the degree of managerial capture of the board. Longer director tenure is also shown to reduce the sensitivity of executive compensation to negative earnings surprises while simultaneously contributing to the lower overall probability of management departures even in the event of a negative earnings surprise. Board independence is evidenced to play no significant role in intermediating the studied relationships. Overall, while postulating the existence of an independence–tenure tradeoff, the paper posits a need for revision of the currently applicable formal criteria of board independence in order for them to accommodate the possible impact of director tenure on the quality of corporate oversight. The present study extends upon the existing literature by expanding the geographical scale of the sample and focusing on indirect symptoms of reduced supervisory effectiveness of the boards.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mielcarz, P., & Osiichuk, D. (2025). The Independence–Tenure Tradeoff in the Boardroom: The Impact of Excess Board Tenure on Executive Compensation and Accountability. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13040223
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.