Abstract
The manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries (LIB) requires critical materials such as cobalt (Co) and lithium (Li) that are essential for clean-energy products including electric vehicles. Because of their rapidly increasing demand and limited supply, the recycle and reuse of these materials from end-of-life LIB have garnered a lot of interest. Electrochemical leaching has emerged as a sustainable method to extract critical materials out of LIB, so life cycle assessment was conducted to compare the environmental impacts with traditional peroxide-based leaching and another emerging technology – SO2-based leaching. The results showed that electrochemical leaching reduces the global warming potential (GWP) by 80%−87% compared to peroxide-based leaching due to a lower acid consumption, avoidance of hydrogen peroxide, and regeneration of reducing agent iron (II) sulfate and compares well with SO2-based leaching in most impact categories. The analysis suggested renewable energy can further reduce the environment footprint of electrochemical leaching.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Adhikari, B., Chowdhury, N. A., Diaz, L. A., Jin, H., Saha, A. K., Shi, M., … Lister, T. E. (2023). Electrochemical leaching of critical materials from lithium-ion batteries: A comparative life cycle assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106973
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.