Electrochemical leaching of critical materials from lithium-ion batteries: A comparative life cycle assessment

39Citations
Citations of this article
146Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries (LIB) requires critical materials such as cobalt (Co) and lithium (Li) that are essential for clean-energy products including electric vehicles. Because of their rapidly increasing demand and limited supply, the recycle and reuse of these materials from end-of-life LIB have garnered a lot of interest. Electrochemical leaching has emerged as a sustainable method to extract critical materials out of LIB, so life cycle assessment was conducted to compare the environmental impacts with traditional peroxide-based leaching and another emerging technology – SO2-based leaching. The results showed that electrochemical leaching reduces the global warming potential (GWP) by 80%−87% compared to peroxide-based leaching due to a lower acid consumption, avoidance of hydrogen peroxide, and regeneration of reducing agent iron (II) sulfate and compares well with SO2-based leaching in most impact categories. The analysis suggested renewable energy can further reduce the environment footprint of electrochemical leaching.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adhikari, B., Chowdhury, N. A., Diaz, L. A., Jin, H., Saha, A. K., Shi, M., … Lister, T. E. (2023). Electrochemical leaching of critical materials from lithium-ion batteries: A comparative life cycle assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106973

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free