The effectiveness of contracting-out primary health care services in developing countries: A review of the evidence

118Citations
Citations of this article
279Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review the research literature on the effectiveness of contracting-out of primary health care services and its impact on both programme and health systems performance in low- and middle-income countries. Due to the heightened interest in improving accountability relationships in the health sector and in rapidly scaling up priority interventions, there is an increasing amount of interest in and experimentation with contracting-out. Overall, while the review of the selected studies suggests that contracting-out has in many cases improved access to services, the effects on other performance dimensions such as equity, quality and efficiency are often unknown. Moreover, little is known about the system-wide effects of contracting-out, which could be either positive or negative. Although the study results leave open the question of how contracting-out can be used as a policy tool to improve overall health system performance, the results indicate that the context in which contracting-out is implemented and the design features of the interventions are likely to greatly influence the chances for success. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2007; all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, X., Hotchkiss, D. R., & Bose, S. (2008). The effectiveness of contracting-out primary health care services in developing countries: A review of the evidence. Health Policy and Planning, 23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czm042

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free