Conclusion: Time for participatory budgeting to grow up

19Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Only a few years ago, participatory budgeting (PB) in the US was in its infancy, a tiny experiment in democracy. After a five-year growth spurt, PB has entered its awkward adolescence, full of bold achievements, flashes of potential, and some stumbles. PBNYC’s innovation has raised new questions for participatory democracy, as the contributors to this special issue highlight. In this article, I lift up the key impacts and challenges that they discuss, and their practical implications. I argue that for PBNYC and other PB processes to grow up, city leaders need to invest in equity, expand project eligibility and funding, and scale PB up to the city level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lerner, J. (2017). Conclusion: Time for participatory budgeting to grow up. New Political Science, 39(1), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2017.1278860

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free