Skip to content

Constructing the Millennial “Other” in United States Press Coverage of the Green New Deal

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Through a critical discourse analysis, this study finds that both The New York Times and Wall Street Journal portray the Green New Deal as a dangerous policy proposed by a cohort of extremist Millennial “Others.” Agonistic media pluralism is stunted. Instead, a uniform and moderate perspective guides reporting, analyses, and commentary. In place of a detailed and robust discussion of the Green New Deal through a multitude of different perspectives, the discursive strategies of “positioning,” “de/legitimization,” and “naturalization” cast supporters of the policy as a dangerous threat within an already rattled, post-2016 United States political landscape. Through this image of threat, the market-based carbon tax is elevated as the best and only way forward. Ultimately, this study finds that the construction of a threatening Millennial “Other” is leveraged to discredit the viability of the Green New Deal and to suppress a diversity of political perspectives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morris, H. E. (2020). Constructing the Millennial “Other” in United States Press Coverage of the Green New Deal. Environmental Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1812686

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free