Project-based learning in schools: a multi-complementary study of its effectiveness

0Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This mixed-methods research evaluates the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) practices using a comprehensive Multi-Complementary (McA) research approach. This assessment involves three main stages: (i) pre-complementary knowledge phase, including a meta-analysis and meta-thematic analysis; (ii) post-complementary knowledge phase, involving a pre-test and post-test control group experimental design; and (iii) complementary phase, synthesizing the previous findings for deeper insights into the effectiveness of PBL practices. The findings revealed that PBL has a significant positive impact on academic achievement based on Hedges’ g value effect size of 1.11. The experimental implementation of PBL in mathematics instruction also yielded a moderate effect (g = 0.66). Thematic analysis highlighted positive effects on scientific process skills and social competencies while also identifying practical limitations in PBL implementation. These results suggest that PBL can significantly enhance learning outcomes when supported by appropriate planning and teacher guidance. The comprehensive outcomes of this study are expected to inform PBL implementation in classrooms and support more effective and efficient use of this approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doğan, Y., Yener, D., Daşdemir, I., Ekşi, Z., & Batdı, V. (2026). Project-based learning in schools: a multi-complementary study of its effectiveness. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06684-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free