A randomized multicenter phase II study comparing capecitabine with irinotecan or cisplatin in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction

51Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The combination of irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil demonstrates efficacy with tolerable safety in the firstline treatment of metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGC). This randomized phase II trial compared for the first time capecitabine with irinotecan or cisplatin in this setting. Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3-week cycles of capecitabine 1000 mg/m2, twice daily for 14 days, with on day 1 either irinotecan 250 mg/m2 (XI) or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (XP). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Of 118 patients recruited, 112 were eligible for safety analysis and 103 for efficacy analysis. In the XI and XP treatment arms, there were no marked differences in ORR, 37.7% versus 42.0%, and median PFS, 4.2 versus 4.8 months, although median OS was longer, 10.2 versus 7.9 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicity was higher in the XP regimen for thrombocytes (18.2% versus 1.8%), nausea (23.6% versus12.3%) and vomiting (16.4% versus 1.8%) and in the XI arm for diarrhea (22.8% versus 7.3%). Conclusion: The comparable activity and safety of the XI and XP regimens establish XI as a relevant platinum-free first-line treatment choice for patients with mGC. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moehler, M., Kanzler, S., Geissler, M., Raedle, J., Ebert, M. P., Daum, S., … Hoehler, T. (2009). A randomized multicenter phase II study comparing capecitabine with irinotecan or cisplatin in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction. Annals of Oncology, 21(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free