Optimizing surveillance and balancing evidence with patient expectations

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For most cancers, intensive posttreatment surveillance does not improve survival, but can induce anxiety in patients and may lead to unnecessary testing due to false-positive results. For colorectal cancer, more intensive surveillance, especially during the first few survivorship years, is warranted. For breast cancer, surveillance for second primary cancers with annual mammography is warranted. This may also be the case for non-small cell lung cancer. For other tumors, less routine surveillance testing can be recommended. © JNCCN - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Denlinger, C., & Langbaum, T. S. (2014). Optimizing surveillance and balancing evidence with patient expectations. In JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (Vol. 12, pp. 781–784). Harborside Press. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2014.0189

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free