Quasar bolometric corrections: Theoretical considerations

46Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Bolometric corrections based on the optical-to-ultraviolet continuum spectrum of quasars are widely used to quantify their radiative output, although such estimates are affected by a myriad of uncertainties, such as the generally unknown line-of-sight angle to the central engine. In order to shed light on these issues, we investigate the state-of-the-art models of Hubeny et al. that describe the continuum spectrum of thin accretion discs and include relativistic effects. We explore the bolometric corrections as a function of mass accretion rates, black hole masses and viewing angles, restricted to the parameter space expected for type 1 quasars. We find that a non-linear relationship log Lbol=A+B log(λLλ) with B≤ 0.9 is favoured by the models and becomes tighter as the wavelength decreases. We calculate from the model the bolometric corrections corresponding to the wavelengths λ= 1450, 3000 and 5100 Å. In particular, for λ= 3000 Å we find A= 9.24 ± 0.77 and B= 0.81 ± 0.02. We demonstrate that the often made assumption that quasars emit isotropically may lead to severe systematic errors in the determination of Lbol, when using the method of integrating the 'big blue bump' spectrum. For a typical viewing angle of ≈30° to the quasar central engine, we obtain that the value of Lbol resulting from the isotropy assumption has a systematic error of ≈30 per cent high compared to the value of Lbol which incorporates the anisotropic emission of the accretion disc. These results are of direct relevance to observational determinations of the bolometric luminosities of quasars, and may be used to improve such estimates. © 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 RAS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nemmen, R. S., & Brotherton, M. S. (2010). Quasar bolometric corrections: Theoretical considerations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408(3), 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17224.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free