Prevalence and risk factors for bovine tuberculosis in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil

37Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiological situation of bovine tuberculosis in Mato Grosso do Sul. The State was divided into three regions, Pantanal, Planalto Norte, and Planalto Sul. In each region, properties were randomly chosen and a pre-established number of animals were also randomly selected; these animals were submitted to the intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin diagnostic test. In total, 17,121 animals from 938 properties were tested. In cases of inconclusive results, the animals were retested with the same diagnostic procedure within a minimum interval of 60 days. An epidemiological questionnaire was administered in the properties sampled to investigate possible risk factors for the disease. In the State, the prevalence of infected herds was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-2.37%) and that of infected animals was 0.035% (95% CI: 0.017-0.069%). Point estimates indicated a higher concentration of infected herds (2.61%; 95% CI: 1.31-5.15%) and infected animals (0.132%; 95% CI: 0.055-0.315%) in the Planalto Sul region, which has a predominance of dairy properties. The prevalence of herds infected with bovine tuberculosis was found to be associated with the production of milk, with technification in the mode of production represented by the use of mechanical milking. Thus, it is recommended that the State adopt strategies for the eradication of bovine tuberculosis, with the structuring of the surveillance system for detection and mitigation of infected herds, incorporating risk-based surveillance elements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guedes, I. B., Bottene, I. F. N., Monteiro, L. A. R. C., Filho, J. M. L., Heinemann, M. B., Amaku, M., … Neto, J. S. F. (2016). Prevalence and risk factors for bovine tuberculosis in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, 37(5), 3579–3588. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n5Supl2p3579

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free