Abstract
Background: This pilot study compares the implementation of active learning pedagogy based on the Nursing Education Simulation Framework using low-fidelity simulation (static manikin) and high-fidelity simulators (human patient simulator) in a pediatric fluid and electrolyte scenario. Method: Nursing students (N = 31) from Modesto Junior College in central California participated in a randomized, two-group experimental design using simulation design instruments developed in the National League of Nursing/Laerdal 3-year multisite study. Results and Conclusions: Students gave high ratings to implementation of actively learning strategies with both low- and high-fidelity simulation; however this study's data reflect the HFS group's perceived active learning, collaboration, and diverse ways of learning to be of more importance than the LFS group's. © 2009 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Butler, K. W., Veltre, D. E., & Brady, D. (2009). Implementation of Active Learning Pedagogy Comparing Low-Fidelity Simulation Versus High-Fidelity Simulation in Pediatric Nursing Education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.03.118
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.