Implementation of Active Learning Pedagogy Comparing Low-Fidelity Simulation Versus High-Fidelity Simulation in Pediatric Nursing Education

59Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This pilot study compares the implementation of active learning pedagogy based on the Nursing Education Simulation Framework using low-fidelity simulation (static manikin) and high-fidelity simulators (human patient simulator) in a pediatric fluid and electrolyte scenario. Method: Nursing students (N = 31) from Modesto Junior College in central California participated in a randomized, two-group experimental design using simulation design instruments developed in the National League of Nursing/Laerdal 3-year multisite study. Results and Conclusions: Students gave high ratings to implementation of actively learning strategies with both low- and high-fidelity simulation; however this study's data reflect the HFS group's perceived active learning, collaboration, and diverse ways of learning to be of more importance than the LFS group's. © 2009 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butler, K. W., Veltre, D. E., & Brady, D. (2009). Implementation of Active Learning Pedagogy Comparing Low-Fidelity Simulation Versus High-Fidelity Simulation in Pediatric Nursing Education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.03.118

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free