A comparison of in-person versus telephone consultations for outpatient hospital care

  • Crook R
  • Iftikhar H
  • Moore S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has triggered a transition towards telemedicine for delivering outpatient care. The evidence base for telemedicine is heterogeneous and its efficacy remains debated. We, therefore, designed a mixed-methods semi-structured survey to evaluate patients' and clinicians' experiences of outpatient telemedicine clinics during the pandemic. One-hundred and eighty-eight patients and 69 clinicians from two hospitals in Gloucestershire completed the survey. The quantitative results for patients rated in-person and telemedicine appointments similarly in all areas except communication (p<0.001) and overall quality (p=0.004), both in favour of in-person consultations, while clinicians rated all aspects of telemedicine appointments as inferior, with the exception of convenience (p=0.643). Qualitative analysis highlighted themes of communication and relationship building difficulties, confidentiality concerns, loss of visual inspection as a clinical tool and debatable time efficiency associated with telemedicine. Significant adaptation of current telemedicine services is required before it will be integrated into current practice. (© Royal College of Physicians 2022 All rights reserved.)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crook, R. L., Iftikhar, H., Moore, S., Lowdon, P., Modarres, P., & Message, S. (2022). A comparison of in-person versus telephone consultations for outpatient hospital care. Future Healthcare Journal, 9(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2022-0006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free