Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has triggered a transition towards telemedicine for delivering outpatient care. The evidence base for telemedicine is heterogeneous and its efficacy remains debated. We, therefore, designed a mixed-methods semi-structured survey to evaluate patients' and clinicians' experiences of outpatient telemedicine clinics during the pandemic. One-hundred and eighty-eight patients and 69 clinicians from two hospitals in Gloucestershire completed the survey. The quantitative results for patients rated in-person and telemedicine appointments similarly in all areas except communication (p<0.001) and overall quality (p=0.004), both in favour of in-person consultations, while clinicians rated all aspects of telemedicine appointments as inferior, with the exception of convenience (p=0.643). Qualitative analysis highlighted themes of communication and relationship building difficulties, confidentiality concerns, loss of visual inspection as a clinical tool and debatable time efficiency associated with telemedicine. Significant adaptation of current telemedicine services is required before it will be integrated into current practice. (© Royal College of Physicians 2022 All rights reserved.)
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Crook, R. L., Iftikhar, H., Moore, S., Lowdon, P., Modarres, P., & Message, S. (2022). A comparison of in-person versus telephone consultations for outpatient hospital care. Future Healthcare Journal, 9(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2022-0006
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.