Bibliometric analysis of research on regenerative periodontal surgery during the last 30 years

22Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectics: The evolution of research activity during the last thirty years on regenerative periodontal surgery is studied. Results: A small number of authors are highly productive with more than 10 publications on the subject each. 79,6% of authors have only produced one article on the subject. The co-authorship average is of 2,68 authors per paper, with a collaboration between 2 and 6 authors. Main journals on the field of regenerative periodontal surgery are Journal of Periodontology and Journal of Clinical Periodontology, which are ranked 14th and 1st in their category according to the Journal Citations Reports. The most used language is English, followed by Japanese and Italian, Spanish occupying the eighth position. Conclusions: A significant increase on scientific literature is observed, similar to the one Dentistry has had. A reduced number of authors account for most production. In the same token, there is a scarce professionalization of researchers in this field, where most of the authors are occasional. On the other hand, there are two very specialized journals on this topic. © Medicina Oral S.L.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gutiérrez-Vela, M. del M., Díaz-Haro, A., Berbel-Salvador, S., Lucero-Sánchez, A., Robinson-García, N., & Cutando-Soriano, A. (2012). Bibliometric analysis of research on regenerative periodontal surgery during the last 30 years. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 4(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.50646

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free