Improved fault analysis of signature schemes

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

At ACISP 2004, Giraud and Knudsen presented the first fault analysis of DSA, ECDSA, XTR-DSA, Schnorr and ElGamal signatures schemes that considered faults affecting one byte. They showed that 2304 faulty signatures would be expected to reduce the number of possible keys to 240, allowing a 160-bit private key to be recovered. In this paper we show that Giraud and Knudsen's fault attack is much more efficient than originally claimed. We prove that 34.3% less faulty signatures are required to recover a private key using the same fault model. We also show that their original way of expressing the fault model under a system of equations can be improved. A more precise expression allows us to obtain another improvement of up to 47.1%, depending on the values of the key byte affected. © IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giraud, C., Knudsen, E. W., & Tunstall, M. (2010). Improved fault analysis of signature schemes. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6035 LNCS, pp. 164–181). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12510-2_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free