Mars solar wind interaction: Formation of the Martian corona and atmospheric loss to space

112Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A three-dimensional (3-D) atomic oxygen corona of Mars is computed for periods of low and high solar activities. The thermal atomic oxygen corona is derived from a collisionless Chamberlain approach, whereas the nonthermal atomic oxygen corona is derived from Monte Carlo simulations. The two main sources of hot exospheric oxygen atoms at Mars are the dissociative recombination of O2+ between 120 and 300 km and the sputtering of the Martian atmosphere by incident O+ pickup ions. The reimpacting and escaping fluxes of pickup ions are derived from a 3-D hybrid model describing the interaction of the solar wind with our computed Martian oxygen exosphere. In this work it is shown that the role of the sputtering crucially depends on an accurate description of the Martian corona as well as of its interaction with the solar wind. The sputtering contribution to the total oxygen escape is smaller by one order of magnitude than the contribution due to the dissociative recombination. The neutral escape is dominant at both solar activities (1 × 1025 s-1 for low solar activity and 4 × 1025 s-1 for high solar activity), and the ion escape flux is estimated to be equal to 2 × 1023 s-1 at low solar activity and to 3.4 × 1024 s-1 at high solar activity. This work illustrates one more time the strong dependency of these loss rates on solar conditions. It underlines the difficulty of extrapolating the present measured loss rates to the past solar conditions without a better theoretical and observational knowledge of this dependency. Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaufray, J. Y., Modolo, R., Leblanc, F., Chanteur, G., Johnson, R. E., & Luhmann, J. G. (2007). Mars solar wind interaction: Formation of the Martian corona and atmospheric loss to space. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 112(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JE002915

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free