What is the actual cost of providing the intrauterine system for contraception in a UK community sexual and reproductive health setting?

7Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The anticipated increase in uptake of intrauterine system (IUS) fittings is slower than predicted by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). There is evidence to suggest that this is because of a high perceived cost of providing this contraceptive method. Whereas studies to date have all guessed at these costs, we calculated the actual costs of providing the IUS. Methods: We tracked the notes of 283 women who had an IUS fitted in our community sexual and reproductive health service for 5 years. We recorded duration of use, measured the actual cost of all appointments and interventions over the lifespan of the device, and compared our findings with NICE predicted costs. Results: With 70% complete follow-up, the average duration of use of the IUS was 3.44 years compared to NICE 's prediction of 3.32. The average annual cost of providing an IUS for contraception in community clinics was £54.55 per woman; this compares with £70.49 modelled by NICE for provision in primary care. Most (80%) of the cost is incurred in the first year. The cost of managing problems is small. Conclusions: Providing the IUS for contraception was 23% cheaper in the present study than that predicted by NICE and cheaper than providing combined oral contraception in our service. Fitting IUSs in community clinics may be cheaper than in primary care. Streamlining the patient pathway will reduce costs further. Restricting access to the IUS because of initial cost is a false economy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cook, L., & Fleming, C. (2014). What is the actual cost of providing the intrauterine system for contraception in a UK community sexual and reproductive health setting? Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 40(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100377

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free