Favorable prognosis of hyperdiploid common acute lymphoblastic leukemia may be explained by sensitivity to antimetabolites and other drugs: Results of an in vitro study

138Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

DNA hyperdiploidy is a favorable prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The explanation for this prognostic significance is largely unknown. We have studied whether DNA ploidy was related to cellular resistance to 12 drugs, assessed with the methyl-thiazol- tetrazolium assay, in samples of 74 children with common (CD10+ precursor B- cell) ALL. Sixteen patients had hyperdiploid ALL cells and 58 patients had nonhyperdiploid ALL cells. Hyperdiploid ALL cells were more sensitive to mercaptopurine (median, 9.0-fold; P = .000003), to thioguanine (1.4-fold; P = .023), to cytarabine (1.8-fold; P = .016), and to I-asparaginase (19.5-fold; P = .022) than were nonhyperdiploid ALL cells. In contrast, these two ploidy groups did not differ significantly in resistance to prednisolone, dexamethasone, vincristine, vindesine, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and teniposide. The percentage of S-phase cells was higher (P = .05) in the hyperdiploid ALL samples (median, 8.5%) than in the nonhyperdiploid ALL samples (median, 5.7%). However, the percentage of cells in S-phase was not significantly related to in vitro drug resistance. We conclude that the favorable prognosis associated with DNA hyperdiploidy in childhood common ALL may be explained by a relative sensitivity of hyperdiploid common ALL cells to antimetabolites, especially to mercaptopurine and to I-asparaginase.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaspers, G. J. L., Smets, L. A., Pieters, R., Van Zantwijk, C. H., Van Wering, E. R., & Veerman, A. J. P. (1995). Favorable prognosis of hyperdiploid common acute lymphoblastic leukemia may be explained by sensitivity to antimetabolites and other drugs: Results of an in vitro study. Blood, 85(3), 751–756. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v85.3.751.bloodjournal853751

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free