Abstract
There is a growing awareness that ‘risk of bias’ distorts the process of generating and interpreting evidence and threatens the validity of psychological and psychiatric research at a number of different levels (Rutter & Pickles,). Such threats are likely to be greatest in fields of study focused on socially/politically contentious issues where beliefs and values are strongly held – especially where there is a lack of methodological rigour.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sonuga-Barke, E. (2017, January 1). Editorial: Science unskewed – acknowledging and reducing ‘risk of bias’ in parenting research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12676
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.