Editorial: Science unskewed – acknowledging and reducing ‘risk of bias’ in parenting research

1Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a growing awareness that ‘risk of bias’ distorts the process of generating and interpreting evidence and threatens the validity of psychological and psychiatric research at a number of different levels (Rutter & Pickles,). Such threats are likely to be greatest in fields of study focused on socially/politically contentious issues where beliefs and values are strongly held – especially where there is a lack of methodological rigour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sonuga-Barke, E. (2017, January 1). Editorial: Science unskewed – acknowledging and reducing ‘risk of bias’ in parenting research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12676

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free