La prioridad de la filosofía de la educación sobre las disciplinas empíricas en la investigación educativa

20Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper explores the relationship between empirical educational research and philosophy of education. The authors analyze the arguments against the dominant character of the empirical paradigm and find three types of arguments. The first one, would consist in arguments that criticize the technification of political decisions. The second one, arguments based in educational particularities and the third one, arguments based on relational characteristic of the educational activity and the value of practical moral judgment. The text ends with a reflection on the contributions of that philosophy of education can make to empirical research. These contributions can be grouped into three categories. First, it can help to establish an epistemological approach to research, second, it offers a holistic view of the educational phenomenon that enables to see better the scope and limits of research results and third, it provides particular modes of articulating thought, to assist educators in critical clarification of educational issues.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cantero, F. G., & Reyero, D. (2014). La prioridad de la filosofía de la educación sobre las disciplinas empíricas en la investigación educativa. Revista Espanola de Pedagogia, 72(258), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.2601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free