Possible role of wild mammals in transmission of pseudorabies to swine.

35Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Of 73 wild and domestic mammals tested from an area endemic for pseudorabies in swine, 16 showed natural pseudorabies virus infection, 8 from farms with no pseudorabies history. In transmission experiments with swine and raccoons (Procyon lotor), pseudorabies was not transmitted between raccoons but was transmitted reciprocally between raccoons and swine by contact and when either consumed infected carrion of the other. The fluorescent antibody tissue section test proved valuable in diagnosis of pseudorabies, especially when employed with the virus isolation test.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirkpatrick, C. M., Kanitz, C. L., & McCrocklin, S. M. (1980). Possible role of wild mammals in transmission of pseudorabies to swine. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 16(4), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-16.4.601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free