Epidemiology of critical states during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technologies

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this research was to have a thorough study of predictors of critical states during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technologies. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 303 patients with “near-miss,” out of which 37 are pregnancy cases after ART (the main group) and 265 are spontaneous pregnancy cases (the control group). Results: Pregnancy after ART constituted 12.3% of all critical states. In the main group (10.8%), severe ovarian hyperstimulation prevailed over all possible reasons for critical states within the period of up to 22 weeks of gestation, whereas bleeding predominated in the control group (57.1%). When pregnancy terms exceeded 22 weeks, the leading reason for “near-miss” in the main group was preeclampsia (59.5%) with underlying thrombophilia (29.7%) and gestation pancreatic diabetes (32.4%); bleeding was the main factor in the control group (36.6%). Conclusion: Women after assisted reproductive technologies constitute a high-risk group for critical obstetric states not only in the nearest time period but also long after ART.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bashmakova, N. V., Davydenko, N. B., Malgina, G. B., & Putilova, N. V. (2016). Epidemiology of critical states during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technologies. Gynecological Endocrinology, 32, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2016.1232050

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free