Digital forensic research: The good, the bad and the unaddressed

112Citations
Citations of this article
245Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Digital forensics is a relatively new scientific discipline, but one that has matured greatly over the past decade. In any field of human endeavor, it is important to periodically pause and review the state of the discipline. This paper examines where the discipline of digital forensics is at this point in time and what has been accomplished in order to critically analyze what has been done well and what ought to be done better. The paper also takes stock of what is known, what is not known and what needs to be known. It is a compilation of the author’s opinion and the viewpoints of twenty-one other practitioners and researchers, many of whom are leaders in the field. In synthesizing these professional opinions, several consensus views emerge that provide valuable insights into the “state of the discipline.”

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beebe, N. (2009). Digital forensic research: The good, the bad and the unaddressed. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 306, pp. 17–36). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04155-6_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free