Fallacies Arising from Ambiguity

  • Walton D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This book is a contribution to the growing literature on fallacies - verbal deceptions and logical errors of different kinds that commonly occur in argumentation. The particular subject of this book is ambiguity in language, and the fallacies that can arise from it. These include the traditional fallacies of equivocation, amphiboly, accent and figure of speech. Also included are some related fallacies that pose problems because, although they are often classified as fallacies of ambiguity, their claim to this categorization is dubious or problematic. These include fallacies like composition and division, quibbling (or confusing a verbal and a real dispute), obfuscation, gobbledygook, wrenching from context, special pleading, and figurative language (although the names for these fallacies are not consistent in the textbook treatments of them).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walton, D. (1996). Fallacies Arising from Ambiguity (1st Ed., Vol. 1, p. 301). Winnipeg: Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.qa/books?id=BkPrCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA17&lpg=PA17&dq=planned+ambiguity&source=bl&ots=9fAip3bufe&sig=e7TMThhT2J3FH5m1FIe7jPFEPtk&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=planned ambiguity&f=false

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free