This article analyzes the contours of populist citizenship as an alternative to neoliberal models of citizenship as consumption, and to liberal models that protect pluralism. It compares how political, socioeconomic, civil, collective, gender, and GLBT rights were imagined and implemented in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador. It explains why despite the expansion of some rights, populists’ use of discriminatory legalism to regulate the public sphere and civil society led to the displacement of democracy toward authoritarianism.
CITATION STYLE
de la Torre, C. (2017). Populist citizenship in the bolivarian revolutions. Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies, 1(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.23870/marlasv1n1ct
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.