Bladder-conserving approach in radical treatment of patients with bladder cancer – A single-institution experience

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate our experience with radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Patients and Methods: The study consisted of 27 patients treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiation (CCRT), 48 treated with radiation alone (RT), and 42 with locally advanced disease treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation (neoCRT). Results: The incidence of acute grade 3 or more genitourinary (GU) toxicity in the RT, CCRT and neoCRT groups was: 25%, 11% and 19%, respectively (p=0.029). The 3-year freedom from grade 2 or more GU toxicity was: 81%, 89%, 54%, respectively (p=0.36). The long-term outcomes of 3-year local control, overall survival, and disease-free survival were as follows: RT group: 74%, 61% and 55%; CCRT group: 76%, 76% and 56%; neoCRT group: 31%, 43% and 18%, respectively. Conclusion: The preferable bladder-conserving approach is CRT, however RT alone might also be an option for appropriately selected patients. NeoCRT for those with locally advanced tumors remain unsatisfactory; adequate selection of patients for radical treatment is of importance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Majewski, W., Nieckula, J., Dworzecki, T., & Miszczyk, L. (2020). Bladder-conserving approach in radical treatment of patients with bladder cancer – A single-institution experience. Anticancer Research, 40(10), 5861–5868. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free