Assessing the rigidity of thermoplastic masks for head immobilization effectiveness in stereotactic radiosurgery

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study compared three Brainlab thermoplastic masks—Cranial 4pi basic, stereotactic (Close Mask V2), and open-face—to see how well they limited head movement during Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Using a head phantom, we tested rotational movements (pitch, yaw, and roll) and measured displacements with the ExacTrac system. The open-face mask had the smallest mean displacements (pitch: 0.14 ± 0.03°, yaw: 0.11 ± 0.02°, roll: 0.16 ± 0.03°) and performed slightly better than the stereotactic mask in pitch (0.20 ± 0.04°, p = 0.0173). The stereotactic mask performed similarly in yaw (0.09 ± 0.02°) and roll (0.16 ± 0.04°). The basic mask showed much more movement (pitch: 0.44 ± 0.13°, yaw: 0.28 ± 0.07°, roll: 0.26 ± 0.07°), making it less suitable for SRS. These results apply to the solid two-piece masks tested here and show that both the open-face and stereotactic masks provide reliable immobilization for accurate SRS treatments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Apale, I. P., Agnew, A., & Foley, D. (2025). Assessing the rigidity of thermoplastic masks for head immobilization effectiveness in stereotactic radiosurgery. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free