Diagnosing migraine in research and clinical settings: The validation of the structured migraine interview (smi)

31Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Migraine is a common disorder that is highly co-morbid with psychopathological conditions such as depression and anxiety. Despite the extensive research and availability of treatment, migraine remains under-recognised and undertreated. The aim of this study was to design a short and practical screening tool to identify migraine for clinical and research purposes.Methods: The structured migraine interview (SMI) based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria was used in a clinical setting of headache sufferers and compared to clinical diagnosis by headache specialist. In addition to the validating characteristics of the interview different methods of administration were also tested.Results: The SMI has high sensitivity (0.87) and modest specificity (0.58) when compared to headache specialist's clinical diagnosis.Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that a structured interview based on the ICHD criteria is a useful and valid tool to identify migraine in research settings and to a limited extent in clinical settings, and could be used in studies on large samples where clinical interviews are less practical. © 2010 Samaan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Samaan, Z., MacGregor, E. A., Andrew, D., McGuffin, P., & Farmer, A. (2010). Diagnosing migraine in research and clinical settings: The validation of the structured migraine interview (smi). BMC Neurology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-10-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free