Divergent and Convergent Creativity Are Different Kinds of Foraging

9Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

According to accounts of neural reuse and embodied cognition, higher-level cognitive abilities recycle evolutionarily ancient mechanisms for perception and action. Here, building on these accounts, we investigate whether creativity builds on our capacity to forage in space (“creativity as strategic foraging”). We report systematic connections between specific forms of creative thinking—divergent and convergent—and corresponding strategies for searching in space. U.S. American adults completed two tasks designed to measure creativity. Before each creativity trial, participants completed an unrelated search of a city map. Between subjects, we manipulated the search pattern, with some participants seeking multiple, dispersed spatial locations and others repeatedly converging on the same location. Participants who searched divergently in space were better at divergent thinking but worse at convergent thinking; this pattern reversed for participants who had converged repeatedly on a single location. These results demonstrate a targeted link between foraging and creativity, thus advancing our understanding of the origins and mechanisms of high-level cognition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malaie, S., Spivey, M. J., & Marghetis, T. (2024). Divergent and Convergent Creativity Are Different Kinds of Foraging. Psychological Science, 35(7), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976241245695

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free