Comparison of visual function following implantation of Acrysof Natural intraocular lenses with conventional intraocular lenses

31Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Recently an intraocular lens (IOL) has been introduced which blocks blue light. As blocking blue light may be to the patient's detriment, this study was designed to evaluate visual function following implantation of a blue-blocking (Acrysof Natural) IOL. Methods: Patients were recruited for this non-randomized controlled interventional study, from those attending a private rural ophthalmology clinic for cataract surgery (n=93). Only those who had previously had a conventional IOL implanted into one eye were offered an Acrysof Natural IOL for the second eye. Postoperatively patients underwent refracted Snellen visual acuity, contrast sensitivity using a CSV-1000E instrument and colour vision testing using a Farnsworth D-15 test, with a subset (n=20) undergoing a Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test. Results were then compared between eyes. Finally, a subset (n=63) completed a survey designed to assess the subjective impact of the Acrysof Natural IOL. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between eyes implanted with conventional IOLs compared with Acrysof Natural IOLs for visual acuity (t=0.57; P=0.57), contrast sensitivity (t=0.43; P=0.67 for 3cycles per degree [cpd], t=0.56; P=0.58 for 6cpd, t=0.09; P=0.93 for 12cpd and t=0.16; P=0.87 for 18cpd) or colour vision with the Farnsworth D-15 (χ2=0.38; P=0.55) or the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test t=0.34; P=0.74). Most subjects reported that they could not tell a difference between the two IOLs subjectively or that any difference experienced was not significant. Conclusion: Our sample did not show any significant differences between eyes implanted with conventional IOLs and the Acrysof Natural IOL. We would suggest that the Acrysof Natural IOL may be used without any significant difference in visual function. © 2007 The Authors; Journal compilation © 2007 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Landers, J., Tan, T. H. T. H., Yuen, J., & Liu, H. (2007). Comparison of visual function following implantation of Acrysof Natural intraocular lenses with conventional intraocular lenses. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 35(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01434.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free